Diversity is our way of life

Diversity is a hot topic in global corporations with headquarters in the West. The home bases of these corporations, traditionally homogeneous societies, have begun to witness and finally acknowledge a change in their racial and religious demographic. And, as a result, have discovered diversity.

Of course, as with everything new that the west discovers, be it human rights or diversity, the issue becomes the hottest and most urgent topic around. Kind of like a new toy that a child discovers and then wants desperately until the toy loses its charm. So, diversity continues to be blared from every loudspeaker backed by huge budgets.

And I am fine with that until you come telling India how to conceptualize diversity in its own social context i.e. maligning hindutva. This is India you are talking to. And before you tell us what to do with hindutva, take the time to understand what it means (check out this super long post by Arun Shourie). Like many other things you consider yourself an authority on, but actually know very little about, you probably have no clue that hindutva is synonymous with life in India. Because hindutva and hinduism are ancient concepts that recognize that nature itself is diverse. And by corollary, that people are diverse.

I am going to stretch this a little further. If India were ever to be defined in a dictionary, the only word that might capture it, would be, diversity. There is nothing that one Indian has in common with another except that we are citizens of the same country. Though, full disclosure, we identify with our community and state way before we do with our country. We do not speak the same language or more often than not do not worship the same god. And very importantly, because we live it, we also realize that diversity isn't always a good thing. Maybe, that's why, at some point, someone tried to make up songs on national TV about Unity in Diversity. I don't think we paid much attention to that either.

As usual, I digress. But here's my final call to the west - stop trumpeting the virtues of diversity and decrying hindutva in the same breath. It just makes you look ignorant. 

Finally, look ahead

I am trying to be rational and positive but the cacophony is getting to me. Here is our first chance at things changing, at growing a backbone after decades of being a doormat and there are too many whiny voices. And the complaints are laughable and most times, extremely self-centred.

I will be the first to admit that Narendra Modi's appeal to the people of Varanasi to start cleaning up the city made me selfishly happy. All our lives, especially when city dustbins haven't been easily available, our parents have drilled the value of not littering, into us. As a result, I continue to hold on to greasy wrappers and juice tetrapaks for hours (and days, if needed) until I find a dustbin. I absolutely hate it when others litter and don't understand the kind of person that can just throw garbage on the side or middle of a street. So, Modi's call, in a sense, was vindication of a personal principle for me.

But I get really annoyed when people whine on social media about how a BJP government might end India's freedom to wear jeans or infringe upon the rights of Indians to live with a partner of their choice. Are you serious? Do you really think, instead of tackling the inherited legacy of more potholes than roads and a state of permanent hunger and crippling destitution, the new government will expend effort on stifling an upper middle class Indian's right to don jeans? When it needs to prevent the rampant acts of terrorism and punish those who dare commit those acts, it will spend time hunting down those who choose to live with a same-sex partner?

Really? That's what is top of mind for you when a huge chunk of your compatriots live without any basic civic amenities or dignity despite working harder than you or I, in our middle-class existence can ever imagine? Contrary to whatever dynastic mouthpieces may say, poverty is not a state of mind. It is a very hard fact. It is crippling and we have to work very very hard to make it go away. Because when you watch your children starve to death or watch your wife die in childbirth in extremely unsanitary conditions, neither your religion or your sexual orientation matters.

And lest I be misunderstood, nobody should ever be persecuted because of their way of life if they are not hurting others. But we are not a developed country and do not have the luxury of only focusing on the rights of the middle or upper classes. As Indians, we owe it to our country to make it a more equal place. And a huge part of that is pulling our countrymen (and women) out of the crushing poverty that has become their lot.

So, keep those jeans on and live with your partner, married or otherwise, gay or straight. Just make sure you think about your country first. Because only when we are developed and people don't live in desperate want, will any of us really be secure. Even building our little gated Elysiums won't save us from the wrath of real poverty.

So, let's look ahead and give it our best shot. Let's work with this government that wants to change things for the better and see how their work measures up to their promises. We will be stupid if we don't.

Unplugging and haat-mukh dhuwa

As we stepped in after walk-celebrating the first hopeful glimpse of spring/summer, I made a beeline to change into my 'home' clothes. And, out of the blue, remembered my family's tradition of ghorot-pindha and baahirot-pindha kapur.

Somehow that jolted my brain into thinking of a recent Tweet (or was it Facebook post) about the pointlessness of trying to 'unplug'. And how, I really don't unplug anymore other than my almost automatic need to change out of 'office-wear' and into home-wear. As I tried to distill it for (read ramble at) my 'phoren' husband, I told him about my family's emphasis on 'haat-mukh dhuwa' (washing your face and feet) as soon as you came home for the day. We were expected to wash, change and would only then get something to eat. And I can barely remember any exceptions.

Thinking back, this practice seems like unplugging to me. A way to make sure that you don't bring home your work and are able to devote yourself completely to your family. Conversely, with the lack of ubiquitous connectivity, you could typically devote yourself pretty completely to school or work while there. Ma always says that Hinduism and Indian traditions developed from societal need and were very logical and this particular one definitely seems to fit the bill.

As we explore values like 'Being Present' at my company in a time when it's become so difficult to focus on one thing at a time, I promise to hold on to haat-mukh dhuwa. I have a hunch though that this might be a case of keeping the symbol alive while allowing the meaning to slip away.

Bright lipstick does not equal rebellion

She is old news. The media, maybe even her celebrity family have moved on to more current topics. But I have had this note in my drafts for some time and I wanted to write it out. So, (late) Sunanda Tharoor, here's why I think you don't deserve my admiration.

I don't know much about you except for what little the media (social and otherwise) has decided to publish and I apologize in advance for my ignorance. But since this blog is just about my opinion, here goes.

You  were lauded by many and criticized by many others for your decision to live life on your own terms instead of following patriarchal rules. Both of these are values I admire. But I don't think you really lived outside those patriarchal norms. You may have ignored the rules of 'virtue' but you definitely seemed to adhere to other patriarchal rules. You seemed to personify the 'modern' high-society (read Page 3 socialite) woman. The kind that is typically distinguished by a particular kind of make-up and fashion choice more than anything else. The kind that helps establish the 'requirement' that women must look a certain way irrespective of the profession they are in -- a very patriarchal expectation.

So, if you were conforming to the patriarchal rules that worked for you and rejecting those that didn't, why were you lauded as a rule-breaker? Is that a crown that's now awarded to those who wear bright makeup and fashionable apparel? Because that is not the definition of a rebel. This smells like a new patriarchal rule to me.

Palpitations are pesky

I have decided that I don't like 'overly happy' people. (I don't think overly is a real word but it's the right adjective in this instance). I guess I always knew it somewhere deep down but just hadn't figured out if saying that out loud would make me a misanthrope.

And it's not as if a particular trigger set this rant off. It's more a case of having to deal with the overly happy-type too often. The kind that seem to pour excitement down a phone cord/air-wave, into myriad social media channels and (the worst) in-person. The kind that makes you feel like a misanthrope just because you don't automatically love all of humanity (I am not even sure if loving all humanity is necessarily safe). 

The kind that I have recently discovered, gives me palpitations. And forces me to calm my quick breathing. I think somewhere along the line, social media is to blame for pulling the dust covers off the overly happy-type. Pre-the barrage of constant emotions on display for the public to consume, the overly happy-type was probably bereft of the right communication channel. That's certainly changed. And with it, the ability to display unceasing happiness has increased manifold. Now, an unsuspecting (often sarcastic) comment by me on my limited-audience social media profiles risks being flooded with 'Likes' by an overly happy-type. This, in addition to the fact that the overly happy-types will always share the many joys in their life -- new cars, clothes, partners, holidays, babies, houses (if Indian, preferably in foreign lands) ad nauseum via their own social media profiles.

I think I would feel a little more kindly towards the overly happy-types if their updates sometimes included sarcasm/a mention of someone who was not themselves or somehow connected to them/some form of negativity. Anything, basically, that proved to me that they are less angelic and a little more human. I guess angels just cause my heart to palpitate. They feel a little too unreal. Fake, maybe?